Scientists have revealed that pathogenic fungi reduce their chemical detection signals to outplay social immunity among their social ant hosts. 

Some social groups like ants try to fight infection with “social immunity”, making use of collective hygiene and health care measures to avoid spreading pathogens throughout the community.


Low-Res_ArgentineAnt_1_(c)Sina Metzler, Roland Ferrigato, ISTA.jpg

Source: Sina Metzler, Roland Ferrigato/ISTA

Unlike humans, ants react immediately to pathogen contamination and not only to the later-developing symptoms of a disease. Nestmates efficiently groom off infectious particles from colony members.

The latest study by Professor Sylvia Cremer and her research team at the Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA) shows the extraordinary effects of these kinds of host-parasite interactions.

Together with chemical ecologists at the University of Würzburg in Germany, the scientists took a close look at social ants, to see how pathogenic fungi respond to their hosts’ social care intervention during infection. The results reveal that fungi reduce their chemical detection signals to outplay social immunity. The study is published in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Less grooming

“Fungi infect the ants from the body surface and grow inside, but nestmates groom off many of the spores before they can even cause internal infection,” explains Barbara Milutinović, one of the lead authors, former postdoc in the Cremer Group and now Marie Curie Sklodowska Fellow at Ruđer Bošković Institute in Croatia.

The scientists set up an experiment where Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) were infected with pathogenic Metarhizium fungi either in the absence or presence of caregiving colony members.

“We found that the fungi fundamentally changed in response to the ant workers’ caregiving,” Milutinović says. Over ten infection cycles, fungi which experienced grooming nestmate ants boosted their spore production compared to fungi accompanied by only individual ants.

“Producing more spores will help the fungus counteract the spore-removal by helping nestmates. Yet we were surprised to see that the ants showed less grooming against the spores,” Sylvia Cremer adds. “This suggests that the spores have become more difficult to detect by the ants.”

Chemical profile

To check why ant workers had difficulties sensing fungi and to analyze possible fungal detection cues, the scientists teamed up with a chemical ecologist from the University of Würzburg.

Local Professor Thomas Schmitt explains: “The fungi that adapted to social hosts were perceived less strongly, due to a strong reduction of a fungi-specific compound called ergosterol.”

Ergosterol is an essential membrane compound that all fungi have. By exposing the ants to pure fungal ergosterol or the slightly different non-fungal vertebrate equivalent, the researchers showed that only the fungal compound induced intense grooming.

Milutinović summarises: “This demonstrates that fungal pathogens react to the presence of caregiving ants by reducing their characteristic fungal signals. They are no longer recognized as a disease threat and can escape the social immunity of the colony.”

The findings highlight the impact that social hosts have on their pathogens by group behaviours.

“It’s fascinating how collective hygiene measures trigger evasion strategies in the pathogen. It would be interesting to see how the ant colony will react in turn. Maybe they become more sensitive in detecting lower and lower fungal cues,” Cremer concludes.