A new study led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has found that an investigational mRNA influenza vaccine helps the immune system recognize a wider range of influenza viruses than today’s standard flu shot, offering stronger and potentially longer-lasting protection.

Influenza_Virus_-_52636756737

Source: NIAID

Creative artwork featuring colorized 3D prints of influenza virus (surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin is blue and neuraminidase is orange; the viral membrane is a darker orange).

About 1 billion people worldwide get the flu each year. Flu shots reduce hospitalizations and deaths, but they are less effective when the vaccine strains don’t closely match the viruses circulating in the community. A broader immune response could translate to a more effective vaccine even when the virus is changing faster than vaccine makers can update their shots.

The vaccine, developed by Moderna, is currently under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and if approved would be the first against influenza using mRNA technology.

The findings are published June 15 in Nature Immunology.

“We are seeing that the mRNA flu vaccine doesn’t just boost the immune system’s response to what it has already seen, it can help expand and diversify the antibody response, covering a broader range of flu strains,” said Ali Ellebedy, PhD, the Leo Loeb Professor in the WashU Medicine Department of Pathology & Immunology and the study’s senior author. “If we can make flu immunity broader and more durable, that could mean fewer hospitalizations and deaths, which translates into a major impact on public health.”

Keeping up with flu

Influenza viruses change as they spread from person to person, picking up small genetic mutations over time. Such changes are driven by immune pressure, forcing the virus to mutate ever so slightly to escape the antibodies. Eventually, these tweaks alter the virus’ surface proteins enough that immune protection from past infections or vaccinations may no longer fully work against new strains. A vaccine that elicits broader antibodies could help limit this viral escape by making it harder for the virus to evade immunity with just a few mutations.

Meanwhile, today’s vaccines are made months in advance of the flu season due to a long manufacturing process. When projections are off, strain mismatch can reduce the efficacy of the flu vaccines from about 60% in a good year down to 19%. In addition to producing the broader immune response identified in this new study, the mRNA technology that helped change the course of the COVID-19 pandemic could allow vaccine manufacturers to quickly update and produce new vaccines, potentially enabling a faster response to emerging viral strains.

Risk of illness

In a separate phase 3 clinical trial, Moderna found that its mRNA-based flu vaccine reduced the risk of illness by 26.6% more than the standard flu vaccine in older adults. Seeking to understand possible causes of this improved protection, the new study examined how immune responses to the mRNA-based flu vaccine differ from those of the standard vaccine.

The researchers, including co-corresponding author Jiwon Lee, PhD, an associate professor in the Department of Convergence Medicine at Korea University College of Medicine and an adjunct professor at Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, followed 75 adults ages 20 to 50 over either the 2022-2023 flu season or the 2023-2024 flu season.

About half received the investigational mRNA vaccine, known as mRNA-1010, which delivers genetic instructions that prompt the body to make proteins from four strains of influenza that trigger immune responses against intruding viruses. The other half got Fluarix, an approved flu shot containing inactivated pieces of four influenza viruses grown in eggs. Both vaccine platforms targeted the same strains recommended by the World Health Organization for the two flu seasons.

Immune response

Analyzing blood samples, the researchers found a stronger immune response in participants who received the mRNA vaccine compared with participants who received the standard flu shot. Specifically, those given the mRNA vaccine produced more flu-specific antibodies and more flu-specific memory B cells, immune cells that remember past infections and can quickly generate antibodies against pathogens such as viruses.

“Influenza is constantly evolving to evade our immune system,” said first author Hanover Matz, PhD, a postdoctoral research associate working in Ellebedy’s laboratory. “But if we can develop vaccines that activate diverse B cells that target a broad portfolio of flu viruses, we have a better chance of avoiding strain mismatches and potentially even reducing the frequency with which the vaccine is needed.”

Germinal centers

To investigate the vaccine’s ability to diversify B cells, the researchers studied in a subset of participants their germinal centers — the immune system’s training hub — where B cells improve their ability to recognize the virus and generate slightly different versions of themselves. These B cells produce antibodies that target different parts of the virus, creating a diverse pool that is more likely to recognize and fight new variants.

Among 13 people receiving the mRNA flu vaccine, five developed flu-specific germinal center responses in the lymph nodes that persisted for the 26 weeks of the study. In contrast, persistent immune responses were not seen in the 15 participants who received the traditional flu shot.

Flu strains

In addition, from four weeks after vaccination until the six-month mark, when the study ended, antibodies from mRNA vaccine recipients recognized and bound to many diverse flu strains across many decades of viral evolution, especially those known to cause the most widespread illness. Antibodies from standard vaccine recipients bound to fewer divergent virus strains. When antibodies bind to viruses, they block them from infecting cells while also tagging them for destruction by immune cells.

“We are seeing that the mRNA flu vaccine is driving strong, persistent germinal center responses,” said Ellebedy. “This can broaden the antibody response and better arm the immune system against an ever-changing virus.”